Thursday, March 23, 2017

Lessons from Literature: Sending or Savoring? (An Old-Fashioned Girl)

Previously in the “Lessons from Literature” series, we’ve looked at a lesson to be gleaned from the characters and one provided by an author’s editorialization. This time, as we turn to Louisa May Alcott’s 1870 novel An Old-Fashioned Girl, we see a lesson that can be learned from the author’s decision-making process (into which she so conveniently happens to give her readers a glimpse).

Once again, making the point requires a spoiler, so consider yourself forewarned. Nevertheless, I don’t want to give too much of the plot away, so I’ll simply share that Polly, the female protagonist, and Tom, the male one, have spent a year apart after becoming acquainted over the course of years and secretly falling for each other. Thus, they have been tortured over the past year, thinking that their feelings were not reciprocated or, worse, were directed toward others.

Suddenly, Tom returns, and he and Polly spend the evening in the company of Tom’s family. As the evening draws to a close, Polly is standing in the dining room preparing to depart, when Tom enters and soon declares his love for her:

“Do you want to know the name of the girl I’ve loved for more than a year? Well, it’s Polly!” As he spoke Tom stretched out his arms to her with the sort of mute eloquence that cannot be resisted, and Polly went straight into them without a word. (338)

And, here, Alcott makes her decision. Instead of continuing to describe the scene in detail, she writes:

Never mind what happened for a little bit. Love scenes, if genuine, are indescribable, for to those who have enacted them, the most elaborate description seems tame, and to those who have not, the simplest picture seems overdone. So romancers had better let imagination paint for them that which is above all art and leave their lovers to themselves during the happiest minutes of their lives. (338-339)

Even during the height of the Victorian era, Alcott’s readers no doubt would have appreciated a more detailed accounting, but she decides to step back and give her characters some privacy instead. In other words, she recognized that not everything in life had to be published.

Now the most immediately apparent and directly corresponding lesson might be something along the lines of respecting the privacy of couples and not expecting them to share all the minute details about their dates, their engagement, their honeymoon, their everyday life, etc.

But the lesson that first came to mind, prompting this post, is the recognition that some things are meant to be savored, not sent.

This reality was first brought to my attention by a chapel speaker during my time in college who pointed out the effect social media has had on our ability to enjoy the moment. For example, instead of soaking in the sunset, we’re too busy trying to fit just the right portion of it in our frame for a post-worthy photo. Instead of absorbing all the sights and sounds of a celebrity encounter, we’re too busy trying to capture the person’s image to prove and/or boast that the encounter did, in fact, happen.

Ever since that day in chapel, the speaker’s message has stuck with me, because it’s so true. How often do we think in terms of social media posts, or, put another way, how often do we do things that we wouldn’t normally do just because we could post about it on social media?

Even that extreme aside, how often do we focus more on documenting moments than we do on living them? Or worse, how often do we miss the still, small whisper of God because we are consumed with snapping a photo before the moment flies by? These are penetrating questions, but ones worth wrestling with.

Don’t get me wrong, as a historian and archivist the impulse to document moments is a strong and often useful one, but I have come to realize that sometimes there is more value in absorbing the full measure of a moment than there is in rushing to document it. As Alcott so elegantly wrote, some things are “above all art,” so trying to capture them and force them into written words or a conglomeration of pixels not only is futile but also detracts from the moment’s poignancy.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that we should never record videos, post pictures, or write entries in our journals. There are certainly appropriate times to do each of these things. But sometimes we should consider what we are missing when we choose to publish instead of pause. What moments we squander when we neglect to savor them and instead send them across the web!

So let's learn a lesson from Louisa May Alcott and leave some things undescribed. Who knows what raptures await?





Citation: Alcott, Louisa May. An Old-Fashioned Girl. New York: Puffin, 2004.

Monday, March 6, 2017

Beautiful Blessings: A Closer Look at the Beatitudes

Opening Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes (found in Matthew 5:2-12) comprise probably one of the more well-known passages of Scripture in the culture at large today. The refrains, “Blessed are the poor in spirit,” “Blessed are the merciful,” and “Blessed are the peacemakers” are phrases that I would guess many people would recognize, even if they didn’t know where the phrases came from.

For Christians who have grown up in church, the Beatitudes are one of those passages that it’s easy to breeze right by, having heard them scores and scores of times. For me, they’ve always been verses that were comforting—after all, who wouldn’t want to read about blessings?—but ones that were also a little confusing.

The way I had read them (and often had heard them spoken about), made it seem like the blessings to be had were general, unspecified bits of goodness that were bestowed upon people who fit the description in the rest of the phrase—mourners who were comforted, meek who would inherit the earth, pure in heart who would see God, etc. The second Beatitude in particular, left me with questions: “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted” (v. 4). Why would being comforted in mourning be something God would bless you for? I thought.

Ah, but then one day I had a lightbulb moment reading the verses I had read countless times before, and I realized that I had been misreading them all along. More specifically, I had been misreading one word all along, and that word made all the difference. . . .

“For” is a tricky little word in the English language. It can be both a preposition (as in, “I made this for you!”), or it can be a conjunction (as in, “She was tired, for she had not slept well the night before.”)  The latter is how we see it in the Beatitudes: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (v. 3). But even in its role as a conjunction, “for” can have various implications.

To say, “She was tired, for she had not slept well the night before,” is to say that the reason she was tired is that she hadn’t slept well. But to say, “The film was acclaimed, for it won an academy award,” is to say that the way in which the film was praised was through its being awarded an Oscar.

Prior to my lightbulb moment, I had been reading the Beatitudes according to the first implication. That is, I took “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy,” to mean that the reason the merciful will be blessed is that they will receive mercy. No wonder I was confused!

As I came to realize my error, I saw that the second part of each sentence is not telling the reason why a person will be blessed; it is explaining the manner in which the person is blessed!

So the poor in spirit are blessed in that the kingdom of heaven is theirs (v. 3).
Those who mourn are blessed with comfort (v.4).
Those who are meek are blessed with the earth as their inheritance (v.5).
Those who hunger and thirst for righteousness are blessed with satisfaction (v.6).
The merciful are blessed through being shown mercy (v.7).
The pure in heart are blessed by seeing God (v.8).
The peacemakers are blessed in that they are adopted by God (v.9).
Those who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness are blessed with the kingdom of heaven (v.10).

See how a proper understanding of that one little word completely changes the meaning and significance of the passage?

Furthermore, with this understanding nailed down, we can begin to discover other truths about these blessings. First of all, they are passive. In other words, they are gifts, not something that the person receiving the gift does for himself. (Incidentally, this is another huge clue that the “for” refers to the “manner in which” instead of the “reason why.”) Comfort, satisfaction, and mercy are things that do not come from within us ourselves. Likewise, adoption and the corresponding inheritance of the earth, the kingdom of heaven and face-time with God are things that are bestowed upon us. They are gifts of grace.

Secondly, the blessings are distinctly spiritual. None of them include tangible things. So if you’re looking for something to support the prosperity gospel mindset that if you love God and do what’s right, He’ll make you—to borrow a phrase from Benjamin Franklin—“healthy, wealthy, and wise,” there’s nothing to help you here. And really, this should be no surprise, given what God tells us elsewhere in His Word. For instance, through the apostle Paul, He has told us that He “has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 1:3, ESV, emphasis added).

Yes, every good thing we have is from God (see James 1:17), including physical comforts, but the blessings that are far more consequential and enduring are those of a spiritual nature such as conviction, forgiveness, love, mercy, peace, satisfaction, joy, and comfort, not to mention the ability to enter into the presence of God and to do so without shame.

There’s so much more that could be written about the Beatitudes—my dad once spent about ten weeks teaching through them on Sunday mornings!—like how they are structured intentionally, beginning and ending with the kingdom of heaven; how they are related to persecution; how they illustrate the progression of sanctification (i.e. growth in holiness) in the life of a Christian, and so much more.

But for now, I’ll just leave you to ponder these blessings that are yours in Christ Jesus, for they are beautiful blessings, indeed.