Monday, February 18, 2019

Same God, New Thing

Isaiah is a wonderful book. Of course, all of God’s Word is wonderful, but Isaiah is one of my favorites. There are so many diamonds hidden among its pages just waiting to be mined. One of these gems is found in chapter 43. I vividly remember the first time Isaiah 43:18-19 lodged in my consciousness. Having read Isaiah multiple times, I had read these verses before, but it wasn’t until one day in high school, when someone shared them as ones that the Lord impressed upon her heart during a season of change, that they really stuck with me.

Ever since then, when I come across this passage reading through Isaiah, I think of that person and her testimony. But a couple of weeks ago, as I read the chapter again, the context of the verses jumped out at me, and I noticed elements of the passage I had never noticed before. Before we dig in, here’s Isaiah 43:16-21 (ESV) in full:

Thus says the LORD,
    who makes a way in the sea,
    a path in the mighty waters,
  who brings forth chariot and horse,
    army and warrior;
they lie down, they cannot rise,
    they are extinguished, quenched like a wick:
 “Remember not the former things,
    nor consider the things of old.
Behold, I am doing a new thing;
    now it springs forth, do you not perceive it?
I will make a way in the wilderness
    and rivers in the desert.
The wild beasts will honor me,
    the jackals and the ostriches,
for I give water in the wilderness,
    rivers in the desert,
to give drink to my chosen people,
     the people whom I formed for myself
that they might declare my praise.”


One of the things that has stood out most to me about this passage is the admonition to “remember not.” So many times throughout the Old Testament, God tells His people to remember—remember how He brought them out of Egypt, remember the commands He gave them, remember how He led them through the wilderness and into the land He had promised them, remember how they put Him to the test. But here, He tells His people to forget. This imperative stands unique in Scripture, so it’s worth taking a closer look.

The command to remember not is not written in a vacuum. It is sandwiched between a description of what God has done and a promise of what He will do. Notice how God is described in verse 16. His covenantal name, Yahweh (LORD) is used, and this covenantal God is one “who makes a way in the sea, a path in the mighty waters” (v.16). The following verse makes it clear that the passage is alluding to the Israelites’ crossing the Red Sea on dry ground and watching as the Egyptian army was destroyed as the waters crashed down on them (v. 17). Typically, when we come across verses like this, we see God telling His people to remember this event that occurred, but instead He says, “Remember not the former things […] I am doing a new thing” (vv. 18-19). This begs the question, what new thing? So we keep reading.

On the other side of verses 18 and 19a, God promises that he “will make a way in the wilderness and rivers in the desert” (v. 20). So this is the new thing, but do you see the parallelism between the new thing and the former thing? There is both comparison and contrast in God’s actions and in the way they are described. In verse 16, God “makes a way in the sea.” In verse 19, He “will make a way in the wilderness.” In verse 16, He creates dry ground in the midst of a massive body of water. In verse 19, He does the opposite, creating running water in the midst of a mass of parched land. Verse 16 is the “former things,” and verse 19 is the “new thing,” but both involve the same elements—water and dry ground—and both involve His making a way.

So why would God tell His people to forget the “former things” that displayed His power so mightily? Perhaps it is so that they—and we—can learn to recognize that, while God is always at work, He does not always work in the same way. Sometimes the water is the issue, and He keeps us from drowning; other times the dryness is the issue, and He keeps us from dying of thirst. Sometimes He gives us firm ground to walk on, and other times He gives us flowing rivers to be satisfied by.  Sometimes the way is to help us pass through our trial, and other times the way is to sustain us in the midst of it.

When we see God work in a given situation, we tend to hold onto that memory, cherishing the reminder of how we saw Him move. But sometimes we hold onto the memory so tightly that it clouds our vision for what else He can do, how else He can work. Then, when another trial comes, we expect Him to come through just like He did the last time. We think that because He is the same God, He will always provide in the same way, and we become disappointed at best or doubtful at worst when He doesn’t make a way in the same manner in which He did before.

But just because the way doesn’t look like it did in former situations, doesn’t mean that the way isn’t there. God is the same God, and He always makes a way; it’s just that sometimes the way comes in a form we didn’t expect. Sometimes we’re looking for a path through our circumstance and don’t even realize that what we really need is a river in the middle of it. Sometimes we are so focused on the former things that we miss seeing the new thing He is doing in our lives.

Whatever we face, God is the same today as He has always been, which means that He is working, because He is an active God. He, who knows our needs perfectly and completely, is making a way, and He is doing it all so that we, the “people whom [He] formed for [Himself], might declare [His] praise” (v. 21). He is the same God, doing a new thing. Oh that we may have the eyes to perceive it and live lives that declare His praise.

To read the Arabic translation of this post, click here.  
لقراءة الترجمة العربية لهذا المنشور إضغط هنا




Monday, February 4, 2019

Rethinking the Right to Life

Abortion has been in the national limelight more than usual lately with New York’s passage of the Reproductive Health Act, which legalized “abortions after 24 weeks in cases where there is an ‘absence of foetal [sic] viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.’”[1] This legislative action came right on the heels of the annual March for Life and Sanctity of Human Life Day in January and in the midst of other abortion-related legislation being proposed or adjudicated in other states such as Vermont, Virginia, and Iowa.

Heightening the emotional impact of the New York law, is a particularly strong irony that came in the governor’s celebratory act of lighting One World Trade Center in pink. While the new World Trade Center was lit in celebration of the potential for ending unborn lives, the memorial at the old World Trade Center site lists the unborn among those killed in 2001. The contrast is beyond chilling. Also chilling is a recent video showing a Virginia state representative blank-facedly admitting that her proposed bill would allow abortions to take place even up to the moment of birth. Thankfully, that bill was defeated.

The issue of abortion raises incredibly strong feelings on all sides. However, my intent with this post is not to go into the medical arguments against the presuppositions in these laws; others have shared their expertise to show that while delivery might be necessary to save a mother’s life, abortion is not. Neither is my intent to answer the myriad of arguments that self-proclaimed “pro-choice” individuals offer up to rationalize abortion, nor to delve into the scientific and technological advancements that increasingly support the claim that life begins at conception. Instead, my purpose is to share how I have come to rethink what is referred to as the “right to life” and to call us all to expand our view of what we are truly dealing with when we make the argument for the protection of the unborn.

Oftentimes in the Right to Life movement, the persuasive arguments center around the unborn themselves: babies (fetuses) are alive, and they have the right to live; extinguishing their lives before they are born robs them of the opportunity to live, to love, and to experience love outside the womb; taking their lives removes their choice for what they want to do with their lives. All of these statements are true, but are they really the fundamental reason why abortion is wrong? In other words, is killing others wrong because they deserve the chance to live and thrive?

Our Declaration of Independence asserts that all of humanity has a right to life. But where does this right come from? Is it a right we give to ourselves? Is it something our Founding Fathers just came up with? As the Declaration acknowledges, the right to life comes from our Creator, i.e. God. There is nothing we bring to the table in and of ourselves that makes us deserving of life. What makes us deserving is not who we are but Who our Creator is. He has made us and, in doing so, has imparted His image to us. That’s what makes us valuable, i.e. worthy of living. So because He is the One who gives us life and who imputes value to us, He is the only One who has the right to take our lives away. Let that sink in for a moment. God is the only One who has the legitimate authority to end a human life.[2]

So when it comes to abortion, while it can be emotionally persuasive to talk about the unborn, to make us feel empathy for their utterly defenseless condition, to horrify us at the callousness it takes to cause a defenseless person pain and then to extinguish their life, I have come to see that these are not the most important reasons we should stand against it.

What is? Just this: to end the life of an unborn human is fundamentally about usurping the power and authority of the almighty God of the universe. And that is a profoundly dangerous thing to do. Look at the consequences of those who tried to become like God--Satan, who incurred eternal damnation, and Adam and Eve, who ensured that they and the entirety of their descendants would be unable to have a relationship with God were it not for God’s intervention through Jesus, are the ones that immediately come to mind. Bottom-line, trying to be like God is not something to mess around with. God is the only all-powerful being and the only all-wise being, so to attempt to assert our own “power” and “wisdom” over His is incredibly foolish. The point, when it comes to abortion, is not so much that the unborn have a right to live as it is that we do not have the right to kill them.

Of course, this is a less palatable point to raise, because it heightens the onus placed on those consenting to and performing the abortion. If we’re not careful, making such a point can be interpreted as heaping guilt on an already struggling individual. And in a pro-life culture that has admittedly done a less-than-acceptable job of showing compassionate care and real tangible and emotional support to mothers and families contemplating abortion, it can be scary to argue for life from this perspective.

That is why we must learn how to simultaneously hold onto the appropriately big view of God, including the thoroughly inherent rights He has by nature of Who He is, and to practically demonstrate His love for women who are carrying the lives He has created. We don’t have a right to take a human life, because that right only belongs to God, but we also don’t have a right to devalue those whom He has created in His image, which includes not only the unborn but also the teens and adults connected to them.

So as we think about the issue of abortion in the coming days and years, let us consider the greatness of God and our own smallness in comparison. Let us acknowledge that we cannot rightfully end another human’s life, because that right only belongs to Him. He is the one who numbers our days and who allots our time in His perfect design (see Psalm 139:16). Let us not presume to know better than He. And in contemplating His greatness, may we also be overcome by His goodness such that we are filled with compassion for those who are hurting, for those who are conflicted, and for those who are convinced. At the end of our earthly lives, when we stand before God to give an account, may we be able to say, “I stood for preserving your gift of life, and I showed your love to all.”     



[1] Pierpont, George, BBC News, “New York abortion law: Why are so many people talking about it?” accessed 29 January 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46994583
[2]  In some cases, e.g. when humans kill other humans in cold blood, God has delegated this authority, but in the case of the unborn, He has not done so.